The past
quarter of my time here in Eldoret has been
marked by the major transition from the planning to the on-the-ground
implementation of the project I have been given the responsibility of managing
this year. My work here in the TB Care
and Research Projects Office at AMPATH is focused on the roll out of new
GeneXpert MTB/Rif machines at three district-level hospitals, in Western,
Nyzana, and Rift Valley provinces in the western part of this country.
![]() |
| Morning coffee and emails at Hotel Rowcena in Busia over looking the local track and football field. |
![]() |
| My high class Kshs 1,000/night room in Busia |
Thus, I’ve been traveling a good deal in
recent months. I have been involved in
the design and management of this project at all levels: from hiring new staff,
developing site- and personnel-specific standard operating procedures,
memoranda of understanding with partnering institutions, designing data and
outcome collection methods, submitting payment request for purchasing of all
equipment, developing and conducting week-long training on the project aims and
the GeneXpert machine, and building relationship with clinical and laboratory
staff at all levels.
My role in our office has been slowly
evolving as I become more independently functional within the AMPATH system and
in the field. I have been enjoying being
on the other end of my initial learning curve as it allows me to plan and
prepare much more effectively for each step along the way. Although I have been feeling much more
comfortable at being an effective project manager here, there are times when I
feel overwhelmed when I think about the large-scale goals of this project for
the year. Specifically, the largest
challenge that I believe this project will face is to develop a regional
referral and transport network of cooperating clinics surrounding each of our
GeneXpert sites to marshal patient samples eligible for Xpert evaluation. The project goal is to create a huge
catchment region so as to reach as many patients as possible with this new
rapid TB diagnostic assay. The
logistical challenges of creating this network are many; this will be further
complicated by the requirement that samples processed on this assay are to be
less than 3 days old in settings without an established cold chain. This will likely be an issue even at our
Xpert sites, let alone out in the periphery.
I digress.
![]() |
| All you need for the GeneXpert: cartridge, lysis buffer, and sputum. |
That will be
the primary challenges we will need to tackle next quarter. This past quarter we have been successful in
the hiring and training of our GeneXpert lab techs and have installed one of
our machines at a district hospital in Busia, a fast growing dusty border town. This site should be poised to
begin in the first week of January, during which month I will spend on the road
working to establish this equipment and gain some traction for our program at
our two other sites.
I could go
on and on regarding this project, but do not want to get caught in the weeds. I really believe in this work and, even in
the face of the myriad of challenges that lay ahead, I remain optimistic about our
project. It is good work for me to be
involved with this year, as it has really challenged me to develop my skills as
a project manager and as a person able to work effectively in a different culture and in this setting that
is vastly different in terms of the overall system of how-things-happen as well as the resource availability.
Moreover, I have grown as a clinical researcher. Every day when I am making decisions
regarding this or that my thoughts are always grounded both with the known
academic literature regarding a specific issue and balancing that with the
on-the-ground clinical relevance to our patients here in this unique
setting. I believe that it is our role as physician-researchers to continually conduct this higher-order analytical
integration of academically derived knowledge and its on-the-ground impact on
people’s lives.
![]() |
| Our new Xpert Lab Tech, Maurice, processing his first sample. |
When designing case definitions for eligibility we had to integrate the imperfect offerings of the literature to the realities of this unique health system to best figure out how we can apply our finite resources for TB screening with the GeneXpert for this granting cycle. We are specifically targeting new smear negative patients who meet the criteria for a clinical diagnosis for TB. Thus, we are not screening all patients who are evaluated for TB in this region (that would be nearly ten thousand for the regions surrounding our sites), we are limiting our screening to those who are clinically suspect for TB but do not have a laboratory diagnosis of TB. Here, many patients treated for TB are clinically diagnosed. We are applying the GeneXpert to provide the clinicians with an additional diagnostic tool to assist in their evaluation.
It is exciting in that no one has used these machines for active, community-based,
case finding of TB; we simple have no one else to compare ourselves to (there are two other GeneXpert machines in Kenya, one in Mombasa and one at the CDC/KEMRI in Kisusm, however, they are solely using it for multi-drug resistant TB screening on re-treatment cases). As such, each day brings us into new
territory with so many unexpected challenges.
I really cannot predict the project outcomes for this work, there are
times when I believe that it will be a total failure and other times I am very
confident in the future success of this important new technology, not only for
our sites but for the whole country.
We’ll likely end up somewhere in between.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
![]() |
| Kabarnet District Hospital |
I have been fortunate to be working on an
implementation project that has the goal of expanding and improve TB care to
communities here (our funding in from the WHO/Stop TB Partnership that is all about implementation, which is different than most projects that are funded by, say the NIH, which are more focused on scientific/clinical practice advancement). I find great meaning within my work this
year; I am not sure I would be as satisfied had I been working on one of the
more research-minded project here is not either translational or
implementation/operational based. Although
I find much of the clinical research going here fascinating and necessary, I
enjoy my work because it brings me into the field and keeps me on the
ground.
My intellectual development has
been very academic and research oriented during the past six years. This has provided me with an important
foundation for my work within medicine as it has enhanced my capacity for diverse engagement within the biomedical/public health field and provided me with research-oriented skill set. However, at the end of the day my passion
lies outside of the literature and within addressing the immediate health challenges
facing communities. The
more I learn about health and wellness, disease and illness, here, the more crystallized
my enthusiasm for primary care becomes. I
believe that much of the success of academic medicine has seen in recent years
has been at the expense of overlooking the foundations of our health systems
both in the US and in places such as Kenya.
Disease prevention through universal primary care access should be our
common goal within medicine and should be emphasized in the global health
community much more than it is. We already know so much (i.e. how to cure TB!), let's start learning about how we can now use this information effectively and sustainably.
![]() |
| School in Kabarnet, one of our three GeneXpert sites. |
I do not
believe that I will commit my life’s work to addressing issues specific to only
one disease, like I am this year. However,
the skills and perspective that I am gaining working in this field this year
has brought me in contact with many issues I will face in my future role as a
physician working towards health care innovation and development to improve
care and access. At the present time,
medicine has a way of corralling academic talent into specific silos: the
HIV/AIDS silo, the TB silo (which, by comparison is incredibly empty), the NTDs
silo, the catch-all Infectious Disease silo etcetera. I do not believe I fit into any of these
silos as I do not I believe diseases and their impact on people's health and lives fit into these silos.
Many believe that a holistically integrated view and approach to the health on an individual or a community is idealistic and, within the academic community, there is a subtext that such an approach is irresponsible (that is, if you try to understand everything that is going on with a patient your ability to address any one concern is diluted). I believe that this reflects the compounding priorities of the western biomedical establishment that has created the health system that we find ourselves in today. It is all a matter of perspective: you can either pay attention to the context of illness and have those external influences effect your therapeutic approach to how to best address disease, or you can ignore it completely and focus solely on the mechanism of disease itself. I worked at the National Human Genome Research Institute at the NIH for a year and found much of their rhetoric to be equally as idealist and irresponsible (i.e. gene therapy? and let's spend tens of millions of dollars on creating a therapy that will take a century for its cost to amortize). Thus, it is all a matter of perspective and priorities.
Many believe that a holistically integrated view and approach to the health on an individual or a community is idealistic and, within the academic community, there is a subtext that such an approach is irresponsible (that is, if you try to understand everything that is going on with a patient your ability to address any one concern is diluted). I believe that this reflects the compounding priorities of the western biomedical establishment that has created the health system that we find ourselves in today. It is all a matter of perspective: you can either pay attention to the context of illness and have those external influences effect your therapeutic approach to how to best address disease, or you can ignore it completely and focus solely on the mechanism of disease itself. I worked at the National Human Genome Research Institute at the NIH for a year and found much of their rhetoric to be equally as idealist and irresponsible (i.e. gene therapy? and let's spend tens of millions of dollars on creating a therapy that will take a century for its cost to amortize). Thus, it is all a matter of perspective and priorities.
I am curious about the future and
believe that we won't be able to rely on traditional approaches to global health to
address emerging realities that are unfolding as we speak. Here, I see a need for a shift in priorities
away from academic research towards a focus on implementation and operational
work that has an ethos founded in care delivery. I am certainly not advocating against clinical research; I truly believe that we need to continue with the research that has the highest potential for the greatest impact. I take issue with the conservatism of traditional granting mechanisms and the expensive incremental changes that such work yields. The state of our global health emergency merit taking greater risks with what type of projects and initiatives are funded. (For an excellent discussion on this very topic see Tim Harford's new book Adapt: why success always starts with failure).
At present, I believe that I am not alone in feeling that there is too heavy of an emphasis on basic science and clinical research in developing countries. As such, perhaps the changes that I am envisioning for the future of global health will begin to expand beyond the realm of academic or governmental institutions. If academic institutions cannot provide the supportive innovation that the present realities require, then we need to confidently look elsewhere. There needs to be a domain within our idea of ‘global health’ in the medical community that focused on improving access to care and professional avenues to achieve this goal. AMPATH is an excellent model for academic partnerships that prioritize providing care first, sustainability second, and research third. Their motto is, Leading With Care.
At present, I believe that I am not alone in feeling that there is too heavy of an emphasis on basic science and clinical research in developing countries. As such, perhaps the changes that I am envisioning for the future of global health will begin to expand beyond the realm of academic or governmental institutions. If academic institutions cannot provide the supportive innovation that the present realities require, then we need to confidently look elsewhere. There needs to be a domain within our idea of ‘global health’ in the medical community that focused on improving access to care and professional avenues to achieve this goal. AMPATH is an excellent model for academic partnerships that prioritize providing care first, sustainability second, and research third. Their motto is, Leading With Care.
There has
never been a better time for us to focus on primary care expansion in the
developing world. Specifically, I
believe the next big step in improving the health communities in LMICs such as
Kenya is to take advantage of the vast outpatient clinic network that has been
built over the past 20 years in response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We need to maintain the relevancy and
viability of this critical community health resource. The overwhelming majority of these clinics
are still disease-specific in their focus but have the capacity to integrate a
diversity of clinical services that are emergently (and immediately) relevant
to the communities that they serve.
HIV/AIDS remains a critical issue and more resources are required for
traditional outreach, screening, treatment and prevention. However, hundreds of thousands of people here
in East Africa, are living healthy lives with HIV and their health needs are
shifting to include diabetes and cardiovascular disease prevention/management,
TB screening, chronic pulmonary disease etc., and they have no where to go to
address these needs. I am very excited to
see the transition towards primary care integration in developing countries;
from my perspective, it is one of the most exciting potentials in the field of
medicine and is where I believe we could have tremendous impact.
However,
this idea is a relatively new concept and is only slowly building
momentum. I had the opportunity to have
lunch with Dr. Joe Mamlin, the director of AMPATH and all around amazing person
(I was told he was considered for nomination for the Nobel peace prize last year… that
sort of amazing). I expressed to him my
interest and optimistic view about family medicine and the importance, yet
scarcity of primary care services here.
He answered, “family medicine is the most important thing, and is the
most difficult thing.” I have no reason
to doubt Dr. Mamlin; his words are both an incredible endorsement but also an
intimation to the challenges that lay ahead, not only for my own professional
path, but for the field of primary care itself.
I have
almost reached the halfway point on my FlexMD year and have thus far found it
to be an incredibly enriching experience for me on a personal level, but also
rewarding in that it has provided me with the opportunity to do real work. There are times when I am out in the field
going to meetings and making things happen that I reflect to myself, ‘finally,
at 27, you are actually doing something.’
There is such satisfaction and heavy joy to be found working in medicine
beyond the walls of the hospital or classroom.
It is a heavy joy because it
finds it foundations within the rhythms of life and within the entire spectrum
of our shared reality where neither all is bad, nor where are most things
good. Life simply is, everywhere. Medicine has brought me closer to people
living within the confines of the joys and sorrows constructed by our society and
expressed through the body. Its my daily
ambition to continue to broaden this perspective and understanding as well as
to work hard to ease the burden a little day by day through making sure this
project is as successful as it can be. I
am looking forward to beginning my second half of my time here. Now the real work begins.
![]() |
| Acacia tree |
[1] Boehme CC, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin
resistance. N
Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 9;363(11):1005-15. Epub 2010 Sep 1. PubMed PMID: 20825313;
PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2947799.
























